Violence is often seen as an aggressive response to strong emotions such as anger, hatred or devastation. It is an outburst of emotions that have been either buried or occurred at the moment.
But the real question is, are people born with violence, or is it taught by society through experiences, environment or conditioning? Can the repeated exposure to abuse, neglect or humiliation lead to violence?
To start off, Violence is often assumed to be a result of experiences or the environment one grows up in, not something one is born with.
On the other hand, trauma deeply affects mental and emotional stability, which creates psychological warfare. As a result, some individuals often resort to violence as a coping mechanism, becoming a “fight” response toward years of pain, abuse, neglect and humiliation. For some individuals shaped by trauma, violence can become a false sense of control when every other aspect of life feels uncertain, painful, or powerless.
But this raises another difficult question,
“Can violence truly be justified simply because it is rooted in trauma?”
The answer is no. Understanding the roots of violence is important, but explanation and justification are two very different concepts. Trauma may explain why someone resorts to violence, but it does not justify the harm caused to others. The consequences experienced by victims are real and cannot be excused on moral grounds.
At the same time, recognising trauma as a contributing factor to violence can make society approach it with a deeper psychological understanding rather than viewing it through a purely ‘evil’ lens. It highlights the importance of mental health support and emotional rehabilitation in breaking cycles of violence.
A question to reflect on,
Why is violence often tolerated or justified in many households while mental health support is ignored or stigmatised?
MBH/PS