No one really prepares you for how hard your first publication will be.
You spend weeks (or months) digging through data, analyzing, writing, editing, re-editing, formatting, checking reference and much more, then you finally submit with hopeful anticipation.
And then, the rejection email lands.
“We regret to inform you…”
Oof. It hits hard. You start doubting:
-
Am I even good enough?
-
Did I waste all this time?
-
Will I ever get published?
Here’s the truth that every researcher learns the hard way:
Rejection is not a verdict. It’s part of the process.
Even the best papers face rejection, sometimes more than once. It’s rarely personal. Sometimes your topic isn’t a fit. Sometimes reviewers want more data. Sometimes it’s timing.
But here’s what matters:
You learn.
You revise.
You resubmit.
And with each round, your paper improves. You improve.
That first rejection? It’s often the moment you stop feeling like a student and start thinking like a scientist.
Tips to push through:
-
Talk to mentors or seniors, most of them have multiple rejection stories.
-
Choose journals that align with your scope and audience.
-
Take reviewer feedback as a gift, not a blow.
-
Keep going. Seriously, don’t shelve it.
If you’re in the middle of your first submission journey: Hang in there. Rejection is not the end, it’s just revision in disguise.
You’ve already done the hard part: creating knowledge. Now it’s about finding the right home for it.