Why should aspiring surgeons or physicians spend years studying subjects like PSM, Forensic Medicine, or Orthopaedics when their primary goal is to specialize — can’t the MBBS duration be shortened to focus on core clinical training earlier?
1 Like
While the primary goal of many medical students is to specialize, the MBBS curriculum provides a foundational understanding of various medical disciplines, including PSM, Forensic Medicine, and Orthopaedics. These subjects:
- Foster a holistic understanding of patient care
- Develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills
- Enhance knowledge of preventive medicine, public health, and medico-legal aspects
- Inform decision-making in various clinical contexts
Shortening the MBBS duration might compromise the breadth of knowledge and skills acquired, potentially impacting future specialists’ ability to provide comprehensive care.
The current curriculum prepares students for diverse medical careers and ensures a strong foundation for specialization.
1 Like
Shortening the length of the course might hinder the knowledge however cutting down by 6 months cab actually work by compiling minor subjects together…
For FMG this duration extends to 6 years, which can be cut down to 5 considering the minor/additional subjects we had in the curriculum.
1 Like
For a moment I like your argument. 
And you want to cut down on SPM, forensic medicine.
But global patterns will not support your thoughts. In the US, the route to become a doctor is even longer. You got to college for four years (after 12th grade), then only you can MCAT (medical college admission test). Then you spend four years in med school. Then 3 years of residency = 11yrs of study after 12th.
Caveat: bill Gates says doctors’ jobs will be eliminated in 10 years from now thanks to Aortic Incompetence, sorry Artificial Intelligence. 
3 Likes
I also agree to shorten the syllabus.
Aetcom period can be lessen.
In FM, studying BNS section can be cut off.
In PSM, also content can be lessen as we have studied in microbiology.
2 Likes
I agree that the duration can be shortened by decreasing the time dedicated to subjects like PSM and FMT.
2 Likes
While it might seem unrelated, subjects like PSM, Forensic, and Ortho build a strong foundation—understanding public health, legal duties, and diverse clinical skills makes you a more complete, responsible doctor. Even specialists need broad knowledge to handle real-world cases safely and confidently. It’s not just about cutting; it’s about caring wisely first!
2 Likes
Well I do agree with what is said, but in my opinion the time for clinical postings and observation can be increased. Also with subjects like FMT and PSM yes they can be re-revised
I believe studying subjects like PSM, Forensic Medicine, or Orthopaedics builds a strong foundation. But, It is true that in MBBS there is alot of time spent on learning and mugging up unnecessary topic in PSM, FMT etc
These subjects matter because:
- They broaden clinical thinking
- Build legal and ethical competence
- Enhance interdisciplinary collaboration
- Shape better public health advocates
- Ensure you become a safe, adaptable doctor, no matter the specialty
The MBBS curriculum can be shortened by reforms but it risks producing narrow and unsafe practitioners
*Arguments For
- Comprehensive education: The program provides a thorough foundation in medical sciences, clinical practices, and patient care.
- Clinical exposure: The lengthy program allows for extensive clinical exposure, internships, and hands-on experience.
- Preparation for complex profession: Medicine is a complex and demanding field, requiring a rigorous education to prepare students.
*Arguments Against
- Long duration: Some argue that the program is too long, leading to delayed entry into the workforce and increased financial burden.
- Theoretical overload: Critics suggest that the curriculum could be optimized to focus more on practical skills and less on theoretical aspects.