You learn science to start with–biology, chemistry, the rudiments of engineering. Then you enter law. then you mix up both. And then somewhere in between, all people around you get perplexed.
Do you make a living as a lawyer or a scientist or corporate?
And the truthful answer to this is: yes.
You write and read molecules like a lawyer and a scientist. You take chemical reactions to be legal claims and legal descriptions to be scientific.
Brain is bilingual.
Even half the time, you are never exactly sure what is going on even with you–but it is all right since the field is rare, complicated and somehow well-compensated. And so you go on learning to survive in the mess.
So what do you think of pursuing law post bsc/msc?
Good option if you like both science and law. It opens careers in patents, pharma, and corporates. But needs an LLB and interest in legal work, not just science.
think it’s a great career option for people who enjoy science but also want to explore something beyond the laboratory. Law after a BSc or MSc, especially in areas like patent law, lets you use your scientific knowledge in a different way. It can be challenging because you need to understand both science and law, but it also offers unique career opportunities and keeps learning interesting.
could relate to the feeling of not fitting into just one category. As someone studying biotechnology, I’ve often wondered how science can connect with other professions. Patent law seems like a field where curiosity, analytical thinking, and scientific knowledge all come together.
I think patent law is a great option for those who enjoy both science and problem-solving beyond the lab. It bridges innovation and legal protection, allowing scientific knowledge to have a real-world impact. It may be challenging but it certainly offers a unique and rewarding career path.