There has been speculation on the outcomes of MBBS-BAMS merging.
Both the courses are 5.5 years long. Both modes of medicine practice have shown promising results since centuries.
There has been modern medicine integrated with ayurveda medicine already for a long time now.
The ongoing students and those who gave NEET-UG may feel a sense of conflict.
How will this scenario turn out??
i donât know how it will work in India, but it will be an issue for foreign graduatesâŚ
Both MBBS and BAMS merging could change how students can learn medicine. Mixing both modern medicine and ayurvedic may help some people but it can also confuse people who are preparing for NEET and this can result worrying about future
The merging of MBBS with BAMS could create a combined medical curriculum, but can also cause confusion and aversion among students. This decision of blending the two courses ultimately depends on how well professors are trained to teach the merged curriculum efficiently, as well as how open students are to the idea of merging.
Merging MBBS and BAMS
Well to be honest, it could have both positive and negetive implications.
Like for the positive side it could bring holistic approach and can foster a more comprehensive understanding of health, probably can result into better diagnosis.
But on the other hand as both medicinal system have different approach of treatment, this can lead to conflicts and confusion in treatment. Also set of new regulatory framework will be required for interdisciplinary curriculum.
âAs an MBBS student, I believe merging MBBS with BAMS compromises the core integrity of both systems. Modern medicine and Ayurveda are based on entirely different philosophies, scientific approaches, and treatment modalities. While integration and mutual respect are valuable, forcing a merger could dilute the depth and quality of both fieldsâ.
The proposed merger of MBBS and BAMS is creating waves across Indiaâs medical education system. This groundbreaking discussion has healthcare professionals and NEET aspirants doubting the future training standards. However, this integration of modern and traditional medicine may help revolutionize patient care in India by bringing a balance between the best of both worlds.
This âKhichri Medicineâ will do no good to Ayurveda. I oppose this Myxopathy. Largely non sense.
Merging both, like anything else, has its pros and cons. On one hand, students learn two different forms of medicine. One would be able to help a patient in all ways as what one form of medicine finds difficult to cure, another is easily able to. But then again, they are two different forms of medicine. They are often found to be at opposite ends, making it difficult to find middle ground.
Well personally I think Its going to be a big hoch poch. There are certain concepts of ayurveda and MBBS that is really polar opposites and any professor canât justify it.
I canât imagine a person studying different type of âpithsâ while studying medicine. Both of these are good in their own place and should stay like that.
How do you think, will the balance or co-existing take place if both contradict each other?
I agree
As an MBBS student, I feel conflicted. While integration of MBBS and BAMS could enhance holistic care, it may dilute core training and create confusion among aspirants and ongoing students like me.
totally disagree, its just unnecessary and will create a burden on students.
There are 3 types of friends (ऌŕĽŕ¤¸ŕĽŕ¤¤):
- Ayurvedic: they are nice but never available if an emergency arises.
- Allopathic- always there for an emergency but you never know their side effects!
- Homeopathic: they give you feel good factor, but of no use (uselessâşď¸)
Thus, as the saying goes:
âEast is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet"
This will be a bad idea.. to begin with there are no studies to show that both these medicines will work together. there might be many harmful drug interactions which will be only known after some clinical studies. starting a course before due research will be harmful rather than useful.
Letâs see how the govt manages it
Merging wonât be good.
The treatment option will be different for a disease.
Ayurveda treatment will be for long duration than allopathy.
For example, in case of diabetes, allopathy primarily focuses on managing blood sugar levels through medications, while ayurveda focuses on managing underlying imbalances within the body to promote overall well-being and potentially reduce the need for medication.
So the treatment and itâs mechanisms of action will be different and will find difficulty in studying while merged.
Why not!! If both of them are somehow fill each others demerits then why not use thie own science in the well being of the humans !
Yes ,apart from the ego and hate the people have about the each otherâs pathy they can be a powerful change in treatment principles.
I believe that since both have the same basics like Anatomy and physiology, merging them in the right way wont be a be an issue.