Yes i agree with you clinical pharmacists should be allowed in India to prescribe under the protocols because we as a pharmacist that is our real duty. and this will surely improve the patient care.
The idea isn’t about replacing doctors it’s about enhancing care through collaborative practice. With the right training, protocols, and legal safeguards, clinical pharmacists could play a vital role in improving access, safety, and chronic disease management in India.
Yes, clinical pharmacists should be allowed to prescribe under protocols or collaborative practice agreements because their specialized knowledge of medications can improve medication management, enhance patient safety, and increase healthcare efficiency by reducing delays in treatment. This can lead to better patient outcomes and more comprehensive care.
On the other hand, some argue it could cause confusion or overlap with physicians’ roles, potentially leading to fragmented care or communication issues within the healthcare team, especially if protocols are not well-defined or standardized.
My take: When properly regulated and clearly integrated into the healthcare team, allowing clinical pharmacists to prescribe collaboratively can significantly improve patient care by leveraging their expertise—provided communication and protocols are robust to minimize confusion.
Yes clinical pharmacist should be allowed to prescribe the medicine it is not to replace the doctor to improve medication management enhancing the patient safety this also helps to better patient care
Yes, clinical pharmacists should be allowed limited prescribing under protocols. We’re well-trained in drug therapy, and this can improve patient care, reduce errors, and ease the load on doctors. But it needs proper legal guidelines and collaboration to avoid confusion.
It is suggested that clinical pharmacists should be granted prescribing privileges, while emphasizing that this does not imply they are usurping the authority of physicians. Furthermore, it is proposed that clinical pharmacists should be consulted during the prescription process, given their extensive expertise in medications.
As a of my opinion, I believe pharmacists should have limited prescribing rights. Their deep knowledge of medicines can help manage minor ailments, reduce doctor workload, and improve access to care. However, it must be done with proper training and regulation to ensure patient safety. Collaborative care between pharmacists and doctors can enhance the healthcare system effectively.
I think clinical pharmacists should be allowed to prescribe under clear protocols or in collaborative practice. Their strong knowledge of medicines can really help manage chronic conditions, reduce doctors’ burden, and improve patient care. But at the same time, it needs proper guidelines. Without clear roles, it could confuse patients or lead to overlapping responsibilities. So, if done with the right training, teamwork, and boundaries, it’s a step forward for better healthcare.
I do believe that with proper training and clear boundaries, clinical pharmacists could safely handle prescribing especially for chronic conditions or minor ailments. Studies show they already possess strong drug knowledge and can improve medication adherence and patient access.
I believe that experienced clinical pharmacist should have prescribing rights but under strict rules and regulations. There should be specific list of drugs which should be allowed for clinical pharmacist to prescribe. And for better and advance treatment clinical pharmacist should refer doctor for further diagnosis and treatment.