Does allopathic or homeopathic medicine truly cure chronic diseases that MBBS doctors often struggle to treat, or does it mainly focus on symptom control rather than permanent solutions?
1 Like
Personally saying ayurvedic medicine is not just pseudoscience but pure science .it might not be effective for acute diseases or mechanical injuries or anatomical defects but it is the gold standard treatment for lifestyle diseases such as psoriasis etc . Bcz it not only focus on symptoms but also on the root cause .
Allopathy is good for chronic disease as homeopathy will take time for it’s effectiveness.
Homeopathy will take time for curring acute disease itself, so in case of chronic disease allopathy is a best choice.
In case of any allergic condition towards allopathy for any patient, at that time homeopathy is a good choice.
I would agree on this fact that ayurvedic medicine are definitely helpful for long term or as we say, quite effective for chronic diseases.
The only problem is it is difficult to find pure ayurvedic medicine at present.
Some or other kind of contamination always exist in them and rather helping one may develop side effects to them.
But where drug resistance is increasing so much these days regarding allopathic drugs,
Homeopathy is definitely a good alternative.
Homeopathy is minimally invasive, gives personalized treatment, and quite effective in chronic diseases such as allergies, arthritis etc.
Still a very debatable topic … However ayurvedic medicine , being the effect Vedic medicine in Indian history was used to treat chronic conditions with plant and nature based formulas… And the amazing thing to notice was , it used to be successful !!
There’s always more than we know that’s hidden in medical history 