Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to draft clinical notes, summarize patient encounters, and assist with documentation. While this promises reduced paperwork and improved efficiency, it raises an important question: are we outsourcing thinking along with typing?
Clinical documentation is not just record-keeping—it reflects reasoning, prioritization, and accountability. Over-reliance on automated summaries may dilute clinical judgment, especially among trainees who learn by writing and reflecting.
Technology should support professionals, not replace cognitive engagement. The challenge lies in using AI as an assistant, not an author.
Where should we draw the line between digital support and clinical responsibility?
MBH/PS