Preventive healthcare would be better than advance treatment, we can make people more aware of the early symptoms, soo that they have a knowledge about that and if they feel likewise they can have a professional advice whereas in advance treatment we can not depend on the prognosis of the case as it varies widely patient to patient.
I would definitely pritorize preventive medicine as why wait for disease to take our body and make case worst. If people have a upper hand of preservative the disease it is always good to go for this option.
Great thought!
Agreed![]()
I think preventive treatment is responsibility of general practitioner. He should work as family physician. Government is doing its part by providing vaccination, screening camps , school health examinations, mediya campaigns. It should be kept in mind we are not reach country to afford high budget for preventive health.
Prevention is better than cure. Preventing the illness is much more important than treatment when we have to compare eachother. Prevention of early diseases can ultimately reduce the risk of the diseases and it’s treatment. Development of better treatment is also required when we couldn’t able to prevent the occurrence of the disease.
As said popularly, prevention is better than cure . No debate in that.
Agreed
Always Prevention because prevention is better than cure.
Preventive measures will limit the patient number but advancement in healthcare facilities should also be available for already affected patients.
Prevention is better than cure always.
Absolutely
Prevention is always better than cure. Once the disease starts, it is costly and time-consuming. Prevention helps in long-term health benefits. I would definitely invest in preventing healthcare.
I think prevention deserves more attention because it can reduce the burden of disease before it starts. At the same time, advanced treatments are equally important for patients who need them. The real goal should be finding the right balance between the two.
Agreed ![]()