Asbestos is a heat-resistant material once widely used in construction. When its tiny fibers are inhaled, they can cause serious lung diseases like asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, often appearing years later.
Should stricter measures be taken to remove asbestos from older buildings to protect public health?
Asbestos is identified carcinogenic material and careful precautions can result in public safety.
Yes, i belive strict regulations need to be taken to remove asbestos material from old buildings globally. But the Indian scenario of asbestos is drastically different than its global counterparts. India still continues to Use asbestos and is one of the largest importer of chrysotile asbestos in construction and Manufacturing sector. The main reason behind the absence of stringent regulations is the construction industry heavily relies on asbestos as it is economic and cheap. It is more essential to implement complete ban on asbestos and promote other safe alternatives such as glass woool, rock wool in India.
It is one of the most common notifiable occupational hazard under Factories act 1948 in India, mainly seen among mining,shipping industries and construction worker which requires attention. Long-standing exposure leads to COPD and Mesothelioma.Their is some monetary compensation by government for sickness, disability and death . But I think, it is not enough. Some precautionary measures like PPEs, regular mandatory checkup , controlling fibre spread via wet methods , proper training of employees, should be taken before the disease cripples a person.Or once for all, it should be banned.
Yes stricter actions should initiate to remove asbestos material for old buildings.As india also should restrict this as europe &us done because it not effect the people who are living there but it also effect the different around the area or far of different age groups.
Sure , not only strict measures but , sustabillity leap on this issue should be raised ,for older building they should be taken more often as compared to the new ones
Since asbestos-related illnesses often surface decades after exposure, it is crucial to strengthen the regulations for its removal from older buildings. Even small exposures carry risk, so proactive measures now could prevent serious health issues in the future.
Governments, industries, health professionals, and communities must work together to ensure that asbestos is not only removed from workplaces and homes but from global market.
Strict measures should be taken to safeguard public against this carcinogenic threat and manage with proper protocol. Also well know fact about asbestos is that it cannot be destroyed by heat and other chemicals material, so proper disposal technics should be studied and utilised
Right, Asbestos exposure even many years ago can cause dangerous conditions like lung scarring (asbestosis), mesothelioma, and other cancers. Worryingly, exposure isn’t always obvious, and symptoms can take 20–40 years to show up.
True that. I’ve seen old factory workers still struggling with breathing issues because of asbestos exposure years back. It’s scary how something once so common in construction turned into a silent killer
Important reminder about asbestos exposure
Once common in construction, now known as a serious health hazard.
Inhaled fibers can lead to asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.
The biggest risk is that symptoms often appear decades later.
Awareness and strict safety measures are key to prevention.”
Asbestos truly is a silent health hazard—its fibers are invisible to the eye, yet prolonged exposure can lead to serious conditions like asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. Awareness, early detection, and strict regulation of asbestos use are essential to protect public health and future generations.
Yes, stricter steps should be taken. Asbestos can cause serious lung diseases. It’s still in many old buildings, and when disturbed, it’s dangerous. Removing it safely can protect public health.
