The points mentioned are relevant. Even after the recent budgeting youngster still doesn’t want to pursue phd/career in research due to lack of stability. This can be improved by increasing stipends and providing the candidates with additional benefits.
I believe research role outside in india has more value than compare to india .After completing Phd there is no guarantee of job
yes, I believe your points are true. As India is developing country, research industry comes with pro and challenge. Government is funding institute like ICMR for more research oriented activities. Clinical trial outsourcing, publications work & medical writing are going uphill. While some challenge remain in grey areas like limited mentorship, financial cost cutting, research requires long hours of work but fails compensate it with bear minimum salary which is huge discouraging issue.
Indian researcher has potential but due to lack of funding lack for facility constant pressure from higher authority people find better money stability and aknowledgement that they cannot get in here
1 Like
Many Indian researchers face challenges like limited funding and temporary contracts in institutions like CSIR, ICMR, and DBT. Some prefer the private sector or opportunities abroad for better stability and resources.
Indian research institutes always lack in fundings, and any particular project is a time -consuming procedure. Yes, private sectors or opportunities abroad are more appealing as it might help you more financially, must be less stressful and would provide stability.
While staying in India enables you to help address local healthcare issues, career progression may be much slower.
While moving to abroad for the same provides better research equipments and stronger mentorship
The choice solely depends upon ones career goals - international recognition outside versus supporting India’s developing research environment
I would honestly take a private job than a research oriented one due to the risks that prevail long term and in India.
While there continues to be debate on how rewarding a research career is in India, in my opinion, it boils down to one’s own priorities and their attitude towards life. While one may consider career growth over public good for their success, another may weigh his/ her success based on their ability to positively impact and contribute to the growth of their country through their research abilities. Essentially, it boils down to one’s outlook!
1 Like
Not very employee friendly and short term roles do create uncertainty .
Yes, the scope of research in India is expanding across diverse key sectors like clinical research, biotechnology, IT, and R &D, driven by government initiatives. Academic institutions are increasing their research activities, offering more chances to conduct high-quality research.
A long-term career in Indian research institutions is meaningful and impactful, but structural challenges like funding and job security can limit growth.
Because of this, the private sector or opportunities abroad often feel more appealing for stability, resources, and faster career progression.
A long-term career in Indian research institutions like CSIR, ICMR, or DBT is often challenging because opportunities are limited, competition is intense, and funding constraints make positions scarce. Many researchers face temporary contracts, delayed hiring, and unstable income, which makes the private sector or opportunities abroad appear more appealing for stability and growth
Research roles in India still have potential, especially in institutions like CSIR, ICMR, and DBT, but many feel challenges like limited funding, job insecurity, and contract work make long-term research careers difficult - which is why some prefer private sector or opportunities abroad.
Don’t be disheartned after reading my comment. One cannot hide the facts. Haqeqat Hai.
If you observe closely, the Education Department functioning under the Union Government has long faced serious gaps in efficiency and accountability. In fact, many departments struggle to deliver their full potential.
Indian education will truly stand at par with leading global universities only when it is guided by experienced academicians with deep subject knowledge and administrative competence. Leadership in education should be rooted in academic expertise, not merely political appointment.
The same principle applies to key sectors like Health and Finance. These critical ministries should ideally be led by domain experts who understand the complexities of their fields, rather than being assigned purely on political considerations.
But who is raising this question consistently, and who is willing to address it seriously?